Friday, July 06, 2012

The Not-So-Good Old Days


As a lover of history and literature, I have often longed for days gone by. I've dreamed of a time when things seemed simpler, better, and more wholesome. Although I would be loath to give up some of the conveniences of our modern era (does anyone else love running water and electricity?), the thought of a time when the only food available was organic and there were no iPhones has a distinct appeal.

But reading Ecclesiastes shifted my perspective a bit.

Do not say,
"Why is it that the former days 
were better than these?"
For it is not from wisdom 
that you ask about this.
~ Ecclesiastes 7:10 ~ 


Here is what 18th century theologian John Gill had to say about this verse:

"This is a common opinion, that in all ages prevails among men, that former times were better than present ones... Which, if rightly inquired into, or the true knowledge of them could be come at, it would appear that they were no better than the present; and that there were always bad men, and bad things done; frauds, oppressions, and violence, and everything that can be complained of now... [The inquirer should] not arraign the providence of God, and murmur at that, and quarrel with it; as if the distributions of it were unequal, and justice not done in one age as in another."

I find it interesting that glorifying the past is really a way of complaining that God has been better to others than He has to us.

And if "the good old days" were really better, one must assume that the human race has degenerated over time (hence the "not-so-good current days").

This quotation has been attributed to Socrates, and seems remarkably applicable to modern society:

“Our youth now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for their elders and love chatter in place of exercise; they no longer rise when elders enter the room; they contradict their parents, chatter before company; gobble up their food and tyrannize their teachers.”

Man is a fallen creature, and has been since the first sin in the Garden of Eden. Sin is the same now as it was then, and just as much of it is bound up in the human heart. And if doubt lingers, even a brief study of Genesis 19 should dispel it! I'm hard pressed to find a more sordid or sickening display of human depravity than what is recorded in that single chapter of the Bible.



But what about the Victorian era, with its morality and propriety? Or the 1950's, with its happy families and pearl-bedecked housewives? True, evil may be more blatantly displayed in our modern culture than it was then (although that is something that fluctuates by era, as even a brief study of history will reveal -- think of ancient Rome shortly before its fall, or even the Roaring 20's). It seems nothing is hidden now, no matter how inappropriate. But in one sense this is a great blessing.

How can I say that?

When all false social morality is stripped away, how much more does the light of the Gospel shine? The veneer of the Victorian age was just that -- a veneer. There were devout Christians then, just as there are now. But not all of those who followed societal norms of propriety were believers, and that means that their "good behavior" left them in the same place as those today who live in open sin. In human terms, it's actually harder to convince those that live a "good" life that they are dead in their trespasses and sins and are desperately in need of a Savior. Of course, it is the Holy Spirit that convicts the sinner of his sin, and He is no more hampered by our contemporary pop culture than by the Pharisaical "righteousness" of Victorian society.


The distractions of the modern world sometimes seem overwhelming, and I often blame them for my lack of concentration in spiritual matters. It's just so easy to get sidetracked when modern life is a blur of advertising and entertainment! But I ask myself, if I lived a century or two ago, could not the increased struggle for the basic necessities of life be just as much of a distraction? Remembering to keep the fire stoked may have been replaced by watching an episode of House Hunters on Hulu, but no matter how modern or antiquated my occupation, it is my own mind and heart that allows distractions to creep in.

Ultimately, God is sovereign -- which means He controls the society we live in. And His sovereignty over history also means that He has placed me in 2012 instead of 1812 for a reason. If I really trust in His perfect plan, I will not wring our hands over some imaginary utopia of years past. Instead, I will testify of His mercy and grace to those who are lost and dying.




You can find my theological disclaimer here.




Monday, July 02, 2012

Getting Carried Away

Sometimes, it's fun to get carried away. And when I heard that a sweet friend of ours had a baby girl on the way, I knew that's exactly what would happen. I can't deny that one of my first thoughts was, "Finally, I have an excuse to make some of the cute baby girl things I've been saving to Pinterest!" *wink*

It all started with owls -- aforementioned friend has a charming little owl necklace and a very fun and eclectic style, so I decided to applique an owl onto a baby dress. Despite the fact that I have never appliqued before. And because my life is just not challenging enough, I decided to make the dress reversible, and add some homemade piping in for good measure. Sometimes I wonder if I'm actually tyring to drive myself insane. All in all, though, the project went remarkably smoothly.


Let's just say the seam ripper and I were
inseparable during the applique process...

I used the slip pattern from Simplicity 2900 to make the dress, extending the shoulder straps and rounding the edges to suit my concept for the dress/jumper. And I lined it, of course, but that was rather simple. Finding buttons to match turned out to be the hardest part! Apparently tasteful buttons in peach or coral are not high on button manufacturers' agendas. But some coconut husk buttons (50% off at JoAnn's!) caught my eye on my third or fourth perusal of the button aisle, and the dress was complete.


The finished dress! To make the lining easier, I bound the hem with bias trim.






But I wasn't done. Because what's a dress without matching bloomers (ruffled, of course)?


My favorite ruffle is a bias (or semi-bias) strip, gathered down the center and
then zig-zagged onto the garment. No hemming required, and very little fuss.

And shoes?


More bias ruffles, gathered on the edge this time. And fold-over elastic for the straps.


And a headband?


More fold-over elastic for the headband -- and lo and behold, I had a 
button in my stash that matched the dress buttons perfectly!


And a pacifier clip? (Seriously, what self-respecting baby girl leaves the house without a matching pacifier clip?)


More bias ruffle and some grosgrain ribbon. I find the pacifier
clips with a loop at the end to be the most versatile.

I told you I got carried away. 

It turned into something of a "if I still have fabric scraps, I will press on" type of deal.


Here's the inside-out view, just in case the owl is a bit too much!

For the shoes, I used the Mila Baby Shoe Tutorial with a few changes -- I opted for bias ruffles instead of the more complicated ruffle in the tutorial (with corduroy, I thought it would come out too bulky, as well). I also sewed the elastic strap into the seam between the lining and the outer, rather than stitching it on at the end. It gives the shoe a cleaner look, in my opinion, though it made assembling the shoe a bit trickier. And lastly, I saved the shoe sole lining for last and hand stitched it in to hide the seam allowance inside (the tutorial has you serge the inside seam). This turned out okay, though my lining is a little "bubbly." But for a baby that's not walking, I don't think it's a problem.

The flower headband and pacifier clip were improvised, and I can't remember what pattern I used for the bloomers (it was from one of the baby patterns in my stash). My bloomer pattern had a center back seam as well as side seams, so I sewed that back seam up, applied my ruffles (which were not included in the pattern), and then sewed the side seams together. Otherwise, sewing the ruffles on would have been a nightmare!

One of my thrifted baskets that I really didn't need turned out to be perfect for displaying the dress (why do I give in to thrift store baskets so easily? Why, oh why?). And after some creative wrapping when my one-and-only piece of cellophane decided to tear in an awkward spot, it was all ready for a certain little lady!

Edited to add: I modified the owl template from Juicy Bits for the applique!